Will Seeing a Gross Picture Again Be Good

Marketplace value of goods and services produced within a country

A map of world economies past size of Gross domestic product (nominal) in USD, World Bank, 2014.^[1]

Gross domestic production (Gross domestic product) is a monetary measure of the market value of all the concluding goods and services produced in a specific time flow past countries.^{[2] [3]} Gdp (nominal) per capita does non, withal, reflect differences in the cost of living and the inflation rates of the countries; therefore, using a footing of Gdp per capita at purchasing power parity (PPP) may be more than useful when comparison living standards betwixt nations, while nominal Gdp is more useful comparing national economies on the international marketplace.^[4] Full GDP tin can also be broken downward into the contribution of each industry or sector of the economy.^[5] The ratio of Gdp to the full population of the region is the per capita GDP and the same is called Mean Standard of Living.

GDP definitions are maintained by a number of national and international economic organizations. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defines Gdp as "an aggregate measure of product equal to the sum of the gross values added of all resident and institutional units engaged in production and services (plus any taxes, and minus whatsoever subsidies, on products not included in the value of their outputs)".^[6] An IMF publication states that, "GDP measures the monetary value of last goods and services—that are bought by the final user—produced in a country in a given menstruum of fourth dimension (say a quarter or a year)."^[7]

Gross domestic product is ofttimes used as a metric for international comparisons as well as a broad measure of economic progress. It is oftentimes considered to be the "earth's virtually powerful statistical indicator of national development and progress".^[8] However, critics of the growth imperative often argue that GDP measures were never intended to measure progress, and leave out fundamental other externalities, such equally resource extraction, environmental bear on and unpaid domestic piece of work.^[9] Critics ofttimes propose alternative economical models such as doughnut economics which utilise other measures of success or alternative indicators such as the OECD'south Improve Life Alphabetize as ameliorate approaches to measuring the effect of the economy on human development and well being.

History [edit]

Quarterly gross domestic product

William Petty came upwardly with a basic concept of Gdp to assail landlords against unfair taxation during warfare betwixt the Dutch and the English between 1654 and 1676.^[10] Charles Davenant adult the method further in 1695.^[11] The mod concept of GDP was first adult by Simon Kuznets for a 1934 US Congress report, where he warned against its utilize as a measure of welfare (encounter below under limitations and criticisms).^[12] After the Bretton Forest briefing in 1944, GDP became the main tool for measuring a land's economic system.^[13] At that time gross national production (GNP) was the preferred judge, which differed from Gross domestic product in that it measured production past a state's citizens at abode and abroad rather than its 'resident institutional units' (see OECD definition above). The switch from GNP to GDP in the US was in 1991, trailing behind most other nations. The role that measurements of GDP played in Globe War II was crucial to the subsequent political acceptance of Gdp values equally indicators of national development and progress.^[14] A crucial office was played here past the US Section of Commerce under Milton Gilbert where ideas from Kuznets were embedded into institutions.

The history of the concept of GDP should be distinguished from the history of changes in many means of estimating it. The value added by firms is relatively easy to calculate from their accounts, only the value added by the public sector, by financial industries, and past intangible nugget creation is more complex. These activities are increasingly important in adult economies, and the international conventions governing their estimation and their inclusion or exclusion in Gdp regularly change in an attempt to keep upwardly with industrial advances. In the words of 1 academic economist, "The actual number for GDP is, therefore, the product of a vast patchwork of statistics and a complicated gear up of processes carried out on the raw data to fit them to the conceptual framework."^[15]

Gdp became truly global in 1993 when China officially adopted information technology equally its indicator of economical operation. Previously, Cathay had relied on a Marxist-inspired national accounting organisation.^[16]

Determining gross domestic product (Gdp) [edit]

An infographic explaining how GDP is calculated in the UK

GDP tin be determined in three ways, all of which should, theoretically, give the same result. They are the production (or output or value added) approach, the income approach, or the speculated expenditure approach. Information technology is representative of the total output and income within an economy

The nigh direct of the three is the production approach, which sums the outputs of every class of enterprise to get in at the full. The expenditure approach works on the principle that all of the production must be bought by somebody, therefore the value of the total production must exist equal to people's full expenditures in buying things. The income arroyo works on the principle that the incomes of the productive factors ("producers", colloquially) must exist equal to the value of their product, and determines GDP by finding the sum of all producers' incomes.^[17]

Production approach [edit]

Also known as the Value Added Arroyo, it calculates how much value is contributed at each stage of production.

This approach mirrors the OECD(System for Economical Co-operation and Development) definition given above.

1. Approximate the gross value of domestic output out of the many various economical activities;
2. Determine the intermediate consumption, i.e., the toll of material, supplies and services used to produce final goods or services.
3. Deduct intermediate consumption from gross value to obtain the gross value added.

Gross value added = gross value of output – value of intermediate consumption.

Value of output = value of the total sales of appurtenances and services plus value of changes in the inventory.

The sum of the gross value added in the various economic activities is known equally "GDP at factor price".

GDP at cistron cost plus indirect taxes less subsidies on products = "Gross domestic product at producer cost".

For measuring output of domestic product, economical activities (i.e. industries) are classified into various sectors. Subsequently classifying economic activities, the output of each sector is calculated by whatsoever of the post-obit ii methods:

1. By multiplying the output of each sector by their respective marketplace price and adding them together
2. Past collecting data on gross sales and inventories from the records of companies and adding them together

The value of output of all sectors is and so added to get the gross value of output at factor cost. Subtracting each sector'south intermediate consumption from gross output value gives the GVA (=Gdp) at factor cost. Adding indirect tax minus subsidies to GVA (GDP) at factor toll gives the "GVA (GDP) at producer prices".

Income approach [edit]

The second way of estimating Gross domestic product is to utilize "the sum of primary incomes distributed by resident producer units".^[six]

If GDP is calculated this way information technology is sometimes called gross domestic income (GDI), or GDP (I). GDI should provide the same amount as the expenditure method described later. By definition, GDI is equal to Gdp. In practice, however, measurement errors will brand the two figures slightly off when reported by national statistical agencies.

This method measures GDP by adding incomes that firms pay households for factors of production they hire - wages for labour, interest for upper-case letter, rent for land and profits for entrepreneurship.

The The states "National Income and Expenditure Accounts" divide incomes into five categories:

1. Wages, salaries, and supplementary labour income
2. Corporate profits
3. Interest and miscellaneous investment income
4. Farmers' incomes
5. Income from non-farm unincorporated businesses

These 5 income components sum to net domestic income at cistron cost.

Two adjustments must be made to become GDP:

1. Indirect taxes minus subsidies are added to get from factor price to market prices.
2. Depreciation (or capital consumption allowance) is added to get from net domestic product to gross domestic production.

Total income tin be subdivided according to various schemes, leading to diverse formulae for Gdp measured by the income approach. A common one is:

Gdp = Bounty of employees COE + gross operating surplus GOS + gross mixed income GMI + taxes less subsidies on production and imports T_{P & Thou} – S_{P & One thousand}

• Bounty of employees (COE) measures the total remuneration to employees for piece of work done. It includes wages and salaries, as well as employer contributions to social security and other such programs.
• Gross operating surplus (GOS) is the surplus due to owners of incorporated businesses. Often called profits, although only a subset of total costs are subtracted from gross output to calculate GOS.
• Gross mixed income (GMI) is the same measure as GOS, but for unincorporated businesses. This often includes almost small-scale businesses.

The sum of COE, GOS and GMI is called total cistron income; it is the income of all of the factors of production in lodge. It measures the value of GDP at factor (basic) prices. The deviation between basic prices and concluding prices (those used in the expenditure calculation) is the full taxes and subsidies that the authorities has levied or paid on that product. So adding taxes less subsidies on production and imports converts GDP(I) at gene toll to GDP(I) at final prices.

Total factor income is too sometimes expressed as:

Total factor income = employee compensation + corporate profits + proprietor'south income + rental income + net interest ^[18]

Expenditure arroyo [edit]

The third mode to judge GDP is to calculate the sum of the final uses of goods and services (all uses except intermediate consumption) measured in purchasers' prices.^{[half dozen]}

Market goods that are produced are purchased by someone. In the case where a good is produced and unsold, the standard accounting convention is that the producer has bought the good from themselves. Therefore, measuring the full expenditure used to buy things is a mode of measuring production. This is known as the expenditure method of calculating Gross domestic product.

Components of GDP by expenditure [edit]

U.S. GDP computed on the expenditure basis.

Gross domestic product (Y) is the sum of consumption (C), investment (I), government Expenditures (1000) and net exports (X – Thou).

Y = C + I + G + (X − G)

Here is a clarification of each Gross domestic product component:

• C (consumption) is normally the largest GDP component in the economy, consisting of private expenditures in the economy (household final consumption expenditure). These personal expenditures fall under one of the post-obit categories: durable appurtenances, nondurable goods, and services. Examples include nutrient, rent, jewelry, gasoline, and medical expenses, but non the purchase of new housing.
• I (investment) includes, for instance, concern investment in equipment, but does not include exchanges of existing assets. Examples include construction of a new mine, purchase of software, or purchase of machinery and equipment for a factory. Spending by households (not government) on new houses is also included in investment. In contrast to its vernacular meaning, "investment" in GDP does not mean purchases of financial products. Ownership fiscal products is classed as 'saving', as opposed to investment. This avoids double-counting: if one buys shares in a company, and the company uses the money received to purchase plant, equipment, etc., the amount will be counted toward GDP when the visitor spends the money on those things; to as well count information technology when one gives it to the company would be to count two times an corporeality that only corresponds to 1 group of products. Buying bonds or companies' equity shares is a swapping of deeds, a transfer of claims on futurity product, not directly an expenditure on products; buying an existing building will involve a positive investment by the buyer and a negative investment by the seller, netting to zero overall investment.
• Yard (government spending) is the sum of regime expenditures on last goods and services. It includes salaries of public servants, purchases of weapons for the military and any investment expenditure by a regime. It does not include any transfer payments, such equally social security or unemployment benefits. Analyses exterior the USA will often care for government investment as role of investment rather than authorities spending.
• X (exports) represents gross exports. Gdp captures the amount a country produces, including goods and services produced for other nations' consumption, therefore exports are added.
• M (imports) represents gross imports. Imports are subtracted since imported goods will be included in the terms Grand, I, or C, and must exist deducted to avoid counting strange supply every bit domestic.

Annotation that C, I, and K are expenditures on final goods and services; expenditures on intermediate goods and services practice not count. (Intermediate appurtenances and services are those used by businesses to produce other goods and services within the accounting year.^[nineteen]) And then for example if a car manufacturer buys car parts, assembles the car and sells it, simply the final car sold is counted towards the GDP. Meanwhile, if a person buys replacement motorcar parts to install them on their car, those are counted towards the Gross domestic product.

Co-ordinate to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, which is responsible for computing the national accounts in the United States, "In full general, the source data for the expenditures components are considered more reliable than those for the income components [come across income method, in a higher place]."^[xx]

GDP and GNI [edit]

Gross domestic product can exist contrasted with gross national product (GNP) or, as it is now known, gross national income (GNI). The difference is that Gross domestic product defines its telescopic according to location, while GNI defines its scope according to buying. In a global context, world Gross domestic product and globe GNI are, therefore, equivalent terms.

Gdp is product produced within a country's borders; GNI is production produced past enterprises endemic by a country's citizens. The ii would be the same if all of the productive enterprises in a country were owned by its own citizens, and those citizens did not own productive enterprises in whatsoever other countries. In practice, however, foreign ownership makes Gdp and GNI non-identical. Production inside a country's borders, only by an enterprise endemic by somebody outside the state, counts as office of its GDP but not its GNI; on the other hand, production by an enterprise located outside the country, merely owned by one of its citizens, counts as part of its GNI but not its Gross domestic product.

For instance, the GNI of the USA is the value of output produced by American-owned firms, regardless of where the firms are located. Similarly, if a state becomes increasingly in debt, and spends large amounts of income servicing this debt this will be reflected in a decreased GNI but not a decreased GDP. Similarly, if a state sells off its resources to entities exterior their country this will besides be reflected over time in decreased GNI, but not decreased Gross domestic product. This would brand the use of GDP more bonny for politicians in countries with increasing national debt and decreasing assets.

Gross national income (GNI) equals GDP plus income receipts from the remainder of the world minus income payments to the rest of the earth.^[21]

In 1991, the United states switched from using GNP to using GDP as its primary measure of production.^[22] The relationship betwixt United States GDP and GNP is shown in table i.7.v of the National Income and Product Accounts.^[23]

International standards [edit]

The international standard for measuring Gdp is independent in the book System of National Accounts (2008), which was prepared by representatives of the International monetary fund, Eu, Organisation for Economic Co-performance and Development, Un and World Banking concern. The publication is normally referred to as SNA2008 to distinguish it from the previous edition published in 1993 (SNA93) or 1968 (chosen SNA68) ^[24]

SNA2008 provides a prepare of rules and procedures for the measurement of national accounts. The standards are designed to exist flexible, to allow for differences in local statistical needs and weather condition.

National measurement [edit]

Countries by GDP (PPP) per capita (Int$) in 2017 co-ordinate to the International monetary fund

> $50,000   $35,000 - $50,000   $20,000 - $35,000   $10,000 - $20,000

$five,000 - $10,000   $2,000 - $5,000   < $2,000   No data

Countries by 2019 GDP (nominal) per capita^{[notation 1]}

> $threescore,000   $fifty,000 - $60,000   $xl,000 - $50,000   $30,000 - $40,000

$20,000 - $30,000   $10,000 - $20,000   $5,000 - $x,000   $2,500 - $v,000

$1,000 - $ii,500   $500 - $1,000   < $500   No data

U.S 2015 GDP computed on the income footing

Within each country GDP is normally measured by a national government statistical bureau, equally private sector organizations ordinarily practise non have access to the information required (particularly information on expenditure and production by governments).

Nominal GDP and adjustments to GDP [edit]

The raw Gdp figure as given by the equations higher up is called the nominal, historical, or current, Gdp. When ane compares Gross domestic product figures from ane year to another, it is desirable to compensate for changes in the value of money – for the effects of inflation or deflation. To make it more meaningful for year-to-year comparisons, information technology may be multiplied past the ratio between the value of money in the year the GDP was measured and the value of money in a base twelvemonth.

For instance, suppose a country's Gdp in 1990 was $100 million and its GDP in 2000 was $300 1000000. Suppose also that inflation had halved the value of its currency over that period. To meaningfully compare its Gross domestic product in 2000 to its Gross domestic product in 1990, nosotros could multiply the Gdp in 2000 by half, to make it relative to 1990 every bit a base year. The result would be that the GDP in 2000 equals $300 million × 1⁄2 = $150 million, in 1990 monetary terms. Nosotros would see that the state's Gdp had realistically increased l percent over that period, non 200 percent, every bit it might appear from the raw GDP data. The Gross domestic product adjusted for changes in money value in this way is called the existent, or constant, GDP.

The factor used to convert Gdp from current to constant values in this way is called the GDP deflator. Dissimilar consumer price index, which measures inflation or deflation in the cost of household consumer goods, the Gdp deflator measures changes in the prices of all domestically produced goods and services in an economy including investment goods and authorities services, as well as household consumption goods.^[25]

Abiding-Gdp figures let us to summate a GDP growth rate, which indicates how much a state'south production has increased (or decreased, if the growth rate is negative) compared to the previous year.

Real Gross domestic product growth rate for year n = (Real Gdp in year due north) − (Real Gdp in year n − 1) / (Real GDP in year n − i)

Another matter that it may be desirable to account for is population growth. If a land's Gross domestic product doubled over a sure period, only its population tripled, the increase in Gross domestic product may not hateful that the standard of living increased for the land's residents; the average person in the country is producing less than they were before. Per-capita Gross domestic product is a measure to account for population growth.

Cross-border comparison and purchasing power parity [edit]

The level of GDP in countries may exist compared by converting their value in national currency according to either the current currency exchange rate, or the purchasing power parity substitution rate.

• Current currency exchange charge per unit is the substitution rate at which one currency will exist exchanged for some other currency as defined in the official international market.
• Purchasing power parity substitution rate is the exchange rate based on the purchasing power parity (PPP) of a currency relative to a selected standard (usually the United States dollar). This is a comparative (and theoretical) exchange rate, the only way to straight realize this rate is to sell an unabridged CPI basket in one land, convert the cash at the currency market rate & then rebuy that same basket of goods in the other land (with the converted cash). Going from country to country, the distribution of prices inside the handbasket will vary; typically, non-tradable purchases will consume a greater proportion of the handbasket's full toll in the higher GDP country, per the Balassa–Samuelson result.

The ranking of countries may differ significantly based on which method is used.

• The current substitution rate method converts the value of goods and services using global currency exchange rates. The method tin offer better indications of a land's international purchasing power. For instance, if 10% of GDP is beingness spent on ownership howdy-tech foreign arms, the number of weapons purchased is entirely governed by electric current exchange rates, since arms are a traded product bought on the international market. There is no meaningful 'local' price distinct from the international price for high engineering science goods. The PPP method of GDP conversion is more relevant to non-traded goods and services. In the above case if hi-tech weapons are to exist produced internally their amount will exist governed past GDP (PPP) rather than nominal GDP.

There is a clear blueprint of the purchasing power parity method decreasing the disparity in GDP between high and low income (Gross domestic product) countries, equally compared to the current exchange rate method. This finding is called the Penn effect.

Standard of living and Gross domestic product: wealth distribution and externalities [edit]

GDP per capita is often used equally an indicator of living standards.^[26]

The major advantage of GDP per capita as an indicator of standard of living is that it is measured frequently, widely, and consistently. Information technology is measured frequently in that virtually countries provide data on Gross domestic product on a quarterly ground, allowing trends to exist seen speedily. Information technology is measured widely in that some measure of GDP is available for nearly every state in the world, allowing inter-country comparisons. It is measured consistently in that the technical definition of GDP is relatively consequent amid countries.

GDP does not include several factors that influence the standard of living. In particular, it fails to account for:

• Externalities – Economical growth may entail an increase in negative externalities that are not direct measured in Gross domestic product.^{[27] [28]} Increased industrial output might grow GDP, but any pollution is not counted.^[29]
• Non-market transactions – GDP excludes activities that are not provided through the marketplace, such as household production, bartering of goods and services, and volunteer or unpaid services.
• Non-monetary economy – Gross domestic product omits economies where no coin comes into play at all, resulting in inaccurate or abnormally depression GDP figures. For case, in countries with major business concern transactions occurring informally, portions of local economic system are not easily registered. Bartering may be more prominent than the employ of money, even extending to services.^[28]
• Quality improvements and inclusion of new products – by not fully adjusting for quality improvements and new products, Gross domestic product understates true economical growth. For case, although computers today are less expensive and more powerful than computers from the past, GDP treats them as the same products by only accounting for the budgetary value. The introduction of new products is also difficult to measure accurately and is not reflected in Gross domestic product despite the fact that it may increase the standard of living. For example, even the richest person in 1900 could not purchase standard products, such as antibiotics and cell phones, that an average consumer can purchase today, since such mod conveniences did not exist so.
• Sustainability of growth – Gdp is a measurement of economic historic activeness and is not necessarily a project.
• Wealth distribution – Gross domestic product does not account for variances in incomes of various demographic groups. Run across income inequality metrics for word of a variety of inequality-based economic measures.^[28]

It can be argued that GDP per capita as an indicator standard of living is correlated with these factors, capturing them indirectly.^{[26] [30]} As a result, GDP per capita equally a standard of living is a continued usage because most people accept a fairly accurate idea of what it is and know it is tough to come up with quantitative measures for such constructs as happiness, quality of life, and well-being.^[26]

Limitations and criticisms [edit]

Limitations at introduction [edit]

Simon Kuznets, the economist who developed the first comprehensive fix of measures of national income, stated in his second report to the US Congress in 1937, in a section titled "Uses and Abuses of National Income Measurements":^[12]

The valuable capacity of the man mind to simplify a complex situation in a compact characterization becomes dangerous when not controlled in terms of definitely stated criteria. With quantitative measurements especially, the definiteness of the consequence suggests, often misleadingly, a precision and simplicity in the outlines of the object measured. Measurements of national income are discipline to this type of illusion and resulting abuse, especially since they deal with matters that are the centre of conflict of opposing social groups where the effectiveness of an argument is oftentimes contingent upon oversimplification. [...]

All these qualifications upon estimates of national income as an index of productivity are simply as important when income measurements are interpreted from the point of view of economical welfare. But in the latter case additional difficulties will be suggested to anyone who wants to penetrate below the surface of total figures and market values. Economic welfare cannot be adequately measured unless the personal distribution of income is known. And no income measurement undertakes to approximate the reverse side of income, that is, the intensity and unpleasantness of effort going into the earning of income. The welfare of a nation can, therefore, scarcely exist inferred from a measurement of national income as defined to a higher place.

In 1962, Kuznets stated:^[31]

Distinctions must be kept in listen between quantity and quality of growth, between costs and returns, and between the short and long run. Goals for more growth should specify more than growth of what and for what.

Further criticisms [edit]

Ever since the development of Gdp, multiple observers accept pointed out limitations of using GDP as the overarching measure of economic and social progress. For example, many environmentalists argue that GDP is a poor mensurate of social progress considering it does not take into account impairment to the environment.^{[32] [33]} Furthermore, the Gdp does not consider human health nor the educational aspect of a population.^[34] American politician Robert F. Kennedy criticized the GDP as a mensurate of "everything except that which makes life worthwhile". He connected to argue that it "does not permit for the wellness of our children, the quality of their instruction or the joy of their play." ^[35]

Although a high or rising level of GDP is oft associated with increased economical and social progress within a land, a number of scholars have pointed out that this does not necessarily play out in many instances. For example, Jean Drèze and Amartya Sen have pointed out that an increment in GDP or in Gross domestic product growth does not necessarily pb to a college standard of living, particularly in areas such as healthcare and didactics.^[36] Another important surface area that does not necessarily better along with Gross domestic product is political liberty, which is nigh notable in China, where Gross domestic product growth is stiff however political liberties are heavily restricted.^[37]

Gdp does not account for the distribution of income amid the residents of a state, because Gross domestic product is merely an aggregate measure out. An economy may be highly adult or growing rapidly, but also incorporate a broad gap between the rich and the poor in a club. These inequalities oft occur on the lines of race, ethnicity, gender, faith, or other minority status within countries.^[38] This can pb to misleading characterizations of economical well-being if the income distribution is heavily skewed toward the high stop, as the poorer residents will not directly benefit from the overall level of wealth and income generated in their state. Even Gross domestic product per capita measures may have the same downside if inequality is high. For example, South Africa during apartheid ranked high in terms of GDP per capita, but the benefits of this immense wealth and income were not shared equally among the country.^[39] An inequality which the Un Sustainable Development Goal 10 amongst other global initiatives aims to address.^[xl]

Gdp does not take into account the value of household and other unpaid work. Some, including Martha Nussbaum, argue that this value should be included in measuring GDP, as household labor is largely a substitute for goods and services that would otherwise be purchased for value.^[41] Even under conservative estimates, the value of unpaid labor in Australia has been calculated to exist over fifty% of the country'southward Gross domestic product.^[42] A afterwards study analyzed this value in other countries, with results ranging from a low of well-nigh 15% in Canada (using conservative estimates) to loftier of nearly 70% in the United Kingdom (using more than liberal estimates). For the U.s.a., the value was estimated to exist between most twenty% on the low end to well-nigh 50% on the high end, depending on the methodology being used.^[43] Because many public policies are shaped past GDP calculations and past the related field of national accounts,^[44] the not-inclusion of unpaid work in calculating Gross domestic product can create distortions in public policy, and some economists have advocated for changes in the way public policies are formed and implemented.^[45]

The UK's Natural Capital Committee highlighted the shortcomings of GDP in its communication to the U.k. Authorities in 2013, pointing out that Gdp "focuses on flows, not stocks. As a issue, an economic system tin run down its assets notwithstanding, at the same time, record high levels of GDP growth, until a point is reached where the depleted avails act as a check on future growth". They then went on to say that "information technology is apparent that the recorded Gross domestic product growth rate overstates the sustainable growth rate. Broader measures of wellbeing and wealth are needed for this and there is a danger that short-term decisions based solely on what is currently measured by national accounts may show to be costly in the long-term".

It has been suggested that countries that have authoritarian governments, such as the People's Democracy of People's republic of china, and Russia, inflate their Gross domestic product figures.^[46]

Enquiry and evolution almost the relation between Gross domestic product and use of Gross domestic product and reality [edit]

Shown is how the global cloth footprint and global CO₂ emissions from fossil-fuel combustion and industrial processes changed compared with global Gdp.^[47]

Instances of Gdp measures have been considered numbers that are artificial constructs.^[48] In 2020 scientists, equally role of a World Scientists' Warning to Humanity-associated series, warned that worldwide growth in affluence in terms of Gross domestic product-metrics has increased resource utilise and pollutant emissions with flush citizens of the world – in terms of due east.g. resource-intensive consumption – being responsible for almost negative ecology impacts and central to a transition to safer, sustainable weather condition. They summarised testify, presented solution approaches and stated that far-reaching lifestyle changes need to complement technological advancements and that existing societies, economies and cultures incite consumption expansion and that the structural imperative for growth in competitive market economies inhibits societal change.^{[49] [l] [47]} Sarah Arnold, Senior Economist at the New Economics Foundation (NEF) stated that "Gross domestic product includes activities that are detrimental to our economy and society in the long term, such as deforestation, strip mining, overfishing and so on".^[51] The number of trees that are net lost annually is estimated to be approximately 10 billion.^{[52] [53]} The global average annual deforested land in the 2015–2020 demi-decade was 10 one thousand thousand hectares and the average annual net woods area loss in the 2000–2010 decade 4.7 million hectares, according to the Global Woods Resource Cess 2020.^[54] According to 1 study, depending on the level of wealth inequality, college Gross domestic product-growth tin can be associated with more deforestation.^[55] In 2019 "agriculture and agribusiness" deemed for 24 % of the Gross domestic product of Brazil, where a large share of annual net tropical wood loss occurred and is associated with sizable portions of this economical action domain.^[56] The number of obese adults was approximately 600 million (12%) in 2015.^[57] In 2013 scientists reported that large improvements in wellness only lead to small long-term increases in GDP per capita.^[58] Later developing an abstruse metric similar to Gdp, the Center for Partnership Studies highlighted that Gross domestic product "and other metrics that reflect and perpetuate them" may not be useful for facilitating the production of products and provision of services that are useful – or insufficiently more useful – to society, and instead may "really encourage, rather than discourage, destructive activities".^{[59] [sixty]} Steve Cohen of the Globe Institute elucidated that while Gross domestic product does not distinguish betwixt different activities (or lifestyles), "all consumption behaviors are not created equal and practise not accept the aforementioned touch on on ecology sustainability".^[61] Johan Rockström, managing director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Bear upon Research, noted that "it's difficult to see if the electric current Thousand.D.P.-based model of economic growth can go hand-in-hand with rapid cutting of emissions", which nations accept agreed to effort under the Paris Understanding in order to mitigate existent-world impacts of climate change.^[62] Some have pointed out that GDP did non adapt to sociotechnical changes to requite a more accurate picture of the mod economy and does not encapsulate the value of new activities such as delivering price-free information and entertainment on social media.^[63] In 2017 Diane Coyle explained that Gdp excludes much unpaid work, writing that "many people contribute costless digital work such as writing open-source software that can substitute for marketed equivalents, and it conspicuously has smashing economic value despite a price of cypher", which constitutes a common criticism "of the reliance on Gdp as the measure of economic success" especially after the emergence of the digital economy.^[64] Similarly Gdp does non value or distinguish for environmental protection. A 2020 study found that "poor regions' Gdp grows faster past attracting more than polluting production after connection to Mainland china'southward superhighway system.^[65] Gross domestic product may not exist a tool capable of recognizing how much natural uppercase agents of the economy are building or protecting.^{[66] [ additional citation(s) needed ]}

Proposals to overcome Gdp limitations [edit]

In response to these and other limitations of using Gdp, culling approaches have emerged.

• In the 1980s, Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum adult the capability approach, which focuses on the functional capabilities enjoyed by people inside a land, rather than the aggregate wealth held within a country. These capabilities consist of the functions that a person is able to achieve.^[67]
• In 1990 Mahbub ul Haq, a Pakistani Economist at the United nations, introduced the Homo Development Index (HDI). The HDI is a composite index of life expectancy at nascence, developed literacy rate and standard of living measured equally a logarithmic function of Gross domestic product, adjusted to purchasing power parity.
• In 1989, John B. Cobb and Herman Daly introduced Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) by taking into account various other factors such as consumption of nonrenewable resources and deposition of the environment. The new formula deducted from GDP (personal consumption + public non-defensive expenditures - individual defensive expenditures + capital letter formation + services from domestic labour - costs of environmental degradation - depreciation of natural majuscule)
• In 2005, Med Jones, an American Economist, at the International Institute of Direction, introduced the first secular Gross National Happiness Index a.k.a. Gross National Well-being framework and Alphabetize to complement GDP economics with additional 7 dimensions, including environment, pedagogy, and government, work, social and health (mental and physical) indicators. The proposal was inspired past the Male monarch of Bhutan's GNH philosophy.^{[68] [69] [70]}
• In 2009 the Eu released a advice titled GDP and across: Measuring progress in a irresolute world ^[71] that identified five actions to improve indicators of progress in ways that make them more than responsive to the concerns of its citizens.
• In 2009 Professors Joseph Stiglitz, Amartya Sen, and Jean-Paul Fitoussi at the Committee on the Measurement of Economic Functioning and Social Progress (CMEPSP), formed past French President, Nicolas Sarkozy published a proposal to overcome the limitation of Gdp economics to aggrandize the focus to well-being economics with a well-being framework consisting of health, surround, work, physical prophylactic, economical safety, and political freedom.
• In 2008, the Centre for Bhutan Studies began publishing the Bhutan Gross National Happiness (GNH) Alphabetize, whose contributors to happiness include physical, mental, and spiritual health; time balance; social and customs vitality; cultural vitality; education; living standards; good governance; and ecological vitality.^[72]
• In 2013, the OECD Improve Life Index was published by the OECD. The dimensions of the index included wellness, economic, workplace, income, jobs, housing, civic engagement, and life satisfaction.
• Since 2012, John Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs have edited an annual World Happiness Report which reports a national measure of subjective well-being, derived from a single survey question on satisfaction with life. Gdp explains some of the cross-national variation in life satisfaction, but more of it is explained by other, social variables (See 2013 Globe Happiness Report).
• In 2019, Serge Pierre Besanger published a "Gdp 3.0" proposal which combines an expanded GNI formula which he calls GNIX, with a Palma ratio and a set of environmental metrics based on the Daly Rule.^[73]

Lists of countries by their Gross domestic product [edit]

• Lists of countries by GDP
• List of countries by GDP (nominal), (per capita)
• List of continents by Gross domestic product (nominal)
• List of countries by GDP (PPP), (per capita)
• List of countries past real Gross domestic product growth rate, (per capita)
• List of countries past Gross domestic product sector composition
• List of countries by past and projected GDP (PPP), (per capita), (nominal), (per capita)

Run into also [edit]

• Economic growth
• OECD Better Life Index
• Chained volume series
• Circular flow of income
• Economic system monetization
• GDP density
• Genuine progress indicator
• Gross regional domestic product
• Gross regional production
• Inventory investment
• Modified gross national income
• Listing of countries by average wage
• Disposable household and per capita income
• List of economic reports by U.S. authorities agencies
• Misery alphabetize (economic science)
• National average bacon
• Potential output
• Productivism
• Social Progress Index

Notes [edit]

1. ^ Based on the IMF data. If no data was available for a country from Imf, information from the Globe Bank is used

References [edit]

1. ^ "GDP (Official Exchange Rate)" (PDF). World Bank. Retrieved 24 August 2015.
2. ^ "Finance & Development". Finance & Evolution | F&D . Retrieved 23 Feb 2019.
3. ^ "Gross Domestic Product | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)". www.bea.gov . Retrieved 23 February 2019.
4. ^ Hall, Mary. "What Is Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)?". Investopedia . Retrieved 23 February 2019.
5. ^ Dawson, Graham (2006). Economic science and Economical Change. FT / Prentice Hall. p. 205. ISBN0-273-69351-4.
6. ^ ^{a b c} "OECD". Retrieved 14 August 2014.
7. ^ Callen, Tim. "Gross Domestic Product: An Economic system's All". IMF. Retrieved 3 June 2016.
8. ^ Lepenies, Philipp (2016). The Power of a Single Number: A Political History of Gross domestic product. New York: Columbia University strategy-3-1-33252415-37392257_9257a4574cf75f9d33bf6a486ecb145d these measures affects in greater extent, the Gdp will already be drastically affected by the health crisis the world is experiencing by COVID-nineteen, which will reduce these expectations.
9. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics : seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London. ISBN978-one-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
10. ^ "Petty impressive". The Economist. 21 December 2013. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
11. ^ Coyle, Diane (half-dozen April 2014). "Warfare and the Invention of Gdp". The Globalist . Retrieved ane August 2015.
12. ^ ^{a b} Congress commissioned Kuznets to create a organisation that would measure out the nation'due south productivity in social club to better understand how to tackle the Great Low.Simon Kuznets, 1934. "National Income, 1929–1932". 73rd Usa Congress, 2nd session, Senate document no. 124, page five-seven Simon Kuznets, 1934. "National Income, 1929–1932". 73rd U.s.a. Congress, 2d session, Senate document no. 124, folio five-7 Simon Kuznets, 1934. "National Income, 1929–1932". 73rd Usa Congress, 2nd session, Senate certificate no. 124, page 5-7. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/championship/971
13. ^ Dickinson, Elizabeth. "Gdp: a brief history". ForeignPolicy.com. Retrieved 25 Apr 2012.
14. ^ Lepenies, Philipp (April 2016). The Power of a Single Number: A Political History of GDP. Columbia University Press. ISBN9780231541435.
15. ^ Coyle, Diane (2014). GDP: A Brief but Affectionate History. Princeton Academy Press. p. 6. ISBN9780691156798.
16. ^ Heijster, Joan van; DeRock, Daniel (29 October 2020). "How Gdp spread to Mainland china: the experimental diffusion of macroeconomic measurement". Review of International Political Economic system. 29: 65–87. doi:ten.1080/09692290.2020.1835690. ISSN 0969-2290.
17. ^ Globe Bank, Statistical Manual >> National Accounts >> GDP–final output Archived 16 April 2010 at the Wayback Car, retrieved October 2009.
    "User'due south guide: Groundwork information on Gdp and GDP deflator". HM Treasury. Archived from the original on 2 March 2009.
    "Measuring the Economy: A Primer on GDP and the National Income and Product Accounts" (PDF). Bureau of Economical Analysis.
18. ^ United states Bureau of Economical Analysis, "A guide to the National Income and Production Accounts of the U.s." (PDF). , page 5; retrieved Nov 2009. Some other term, "business current transfer payments", may exist added. Also, the document indicates that the upper-case letter consumption aligning (CCAdj) and the inventory valuation adjustment (IVA) are applied to the proprietor's income and corporate profits terms; and CCAdj is applied to rental income.
19. ^ Thayer Watkins, San José State Academy Department of Economics, "Gross Domestic Product from the Transactions Table for an Economy", commentary to commencement table, " Transactions Table for an Economy". (Folio retrieved November 2009.)
20. ^ Concepts and Methods of the Usa National Income and Production Accounts, chap. 2.
21. ^ Lequiller, François; Derek Blades (2006). Understanding National Accounts. OECD. p. 18. ISBN978-92-64-02566-0. To convert GDP into GNI, it is necessary to add the income received past resident units from abroad and deduct the income created past production in the country but transferred to units residing abroad.
22. ^ United States, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Glossary, "GDP" Archived 29 January 2018 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved Nov 2009.
23. ^ "U.S. Section of Commerce. Agency of Economic Analysis". Bea.gov. 21 October 2009. Archived from the original on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 31 July 2010.
24. ^ "National Accounts". Central Bureau of Statistics. Archived from the original on 16 April 2011. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
25. ^ HM Treasury, Groundwork data on Gdp and Gdp deflator
    Some of the complications involved in comparing national accounts from different years are explained in this Earth Bank certificate Archived 16 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine.
26. ^ ^{a b c} "How Do We Measure Standard of Living?" (PDF). The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
27. ^ Mankiw, N. Chiliad.; Taylor, M. P. (2011). Economics (2nd, revised ed.). Andover: Cengage Learning. ISBN978-1-84480-870-0.
28. ^ ^{a b c} "Macroeconomics - Gross domestic product and Welfare". Retrieved 21 February 2015.
29. ^ Choi, Kwan. "Gross Domestic Product". Introduction to the World Economy.
30. ^ "How Real GDP per Capita Affects the Standard of Living". Study.com.
31. ^ Simon Kuznets. "How To Judge Quality". The New Democracy, 20 October 1962
32. ^ van den Bergh, Jeroen (xiii April 2010). "The Virtues of Ignoring Gdp". The Broker.
33. ^ Gertner, Jon (13 May 2010). "The Rise and Fall of Grand.D.P.". New York Times Magazine. Archived from the original on 2022-01-02.
34. ^ "What Are the Advantages & Disadvantages of the GDP in Macroeconomics?". Bizfluent . Retrieved 2021-05-07 .
35. ^ Suzuki, Dabid (February 28, 2014). "How the Gross domestic product Measures Everything 'Except That Which Makes Life Worthwhile'". EcoWatch . Retrieved May v, 2021. {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
36. ^ Drèze, Jean; Sen, Amartya (2013). An Uncertain Glory: Republic of india and its Contradictions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN9781400848775.
37. ^ "China Country Report Freedom in the World 2012". freedomhouse.org. xix March 2012. Archived from the original on 17 May 2016. Retrieved 6 May 2016.
38. ^ "Inequality hurts economic growth, finds OECD research - OECD". www.oecd.org . Retrieved 2022-04-25 .
39. ^ "S AFRICA ECONOMIC UPDATE" (PDF). worldbank.org.
40. ^ "Goal 10 targets". UNDP. Archived from the original on 27 November 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2020.
41. ^ Nussbaum, Martha C. (2013). Creating capabilities : the human evolution approach. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN978-0674072350.
42. ^ Blades, François; Lequiller, Derek (2006). Understanding national accounts (Reprint ed.). Paris: OECD. p. 112. ISBN978-92-64-02566-0.
43. ^ "Incorporating Estimates of Household Production of Non-Marketplace Services into International Comparisons of Fabric Well-Being".
44. ^ Holcombe, Randall Grand. (2004). "National Income Bookkeeping and Public Policy". Review of Austrian Economics. 17 (4): 387–405. doi:x.1023/B:RAEC.0000044638.48465.df. S2CID 30021697.
45. ^ "National Accounts: A Applied Introduction" (PDF).
46. ^ Ingraham, Christopher (xv May 2018). "Satellite data strongly suggests that Cathay, Russia and other authoritarian countries are fudging their Gdp reports". SFGate. San Francisco. Washington Post. Retrieved 16 May 2018.
47. ^ ^{a b} Thomas Wiedmann; Manfred Lenzen; Lorenz T. Keyßer; Julia Steinberger (nineteen June 2020). "Scientists' warning on affluence". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. PMC7305220. PMID 32561753. Text and prototype were copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution iv.0 International License.
48. ^ Pilling, David (4 July 2014). "Has GDP outgrown its use?". www.ft.com . Retrieved 17 September 2020.
49. ^ "Affluence is killing the planet, warn scientists". phys.org . Retrieved five July 2020.
50. ^ "Overconsumption and growth economy key drivers of environmental crises". phys.org . Retrieved five July 2020.
51. ^ "Why Gdp is no longer the most effective measure of economic success". www.worldfinance.com . Retrieved 17 September 2020.
52. ^ "World has 3 trillion copse just they're falling at alarming charge per unit". Reuters. 2 September 2015. Retrieved 26 May 2020.
53. ^ Carrington, Damian (four July 2019). "Tree planting 'has mind-blowing potential' to tackle climate crisis". The Guardian . Retrieved 26 May 2020.
54. ^ "Global Forest Resource Cess 2020". world wide web.fao.org . Retrieved 26 May 2020.
55. ^ Koop, Gary; Tole, Lise (1 October 2001). "Deforestation, distribution and development". Global Environmental Change. 11 (iii): 193–202. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00057-i. ISSN 0959-3780. Retrieved 17 September 2020.
56. ^ Arruda, Daniel; Candido, Hugo G.; Fonseca, Rúbia (27 September 2019). "Amazon fires threaten Brazil'due south agribusiness". Scientific discipline. 365 (6460): 1387. Bibcode:2019Sci...365.1387A. doi:10.1126/science.aaz2198. PMID 31604261. S2CID 203566011. Retrieved 17 September 2020.
57. ^ Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K, Lee A, Marczak L, Mokdad AH, Moradi-Lakeh M, Naghavi Thou, Salama JS, Vos T, Allay KH, Abbafati C, Ahmed MB, Al-Aly Z, Alkerwi A, Al-Raddadi R, Amare AT, Amberbir A, Amegah AK, Amini Due east, Amrock SM, Anjana RM, Ärnlöv J, Asayesh H, Banerjee A, Barac A, Baye E, Bennett DA, Beyene AS, Biadgilign S, Biryukov South, Bjertness E, Boneya DJ, Campos-Nonato I, Carrero JJ, Cecilio P, Cercy K, Ciobanu LG, Cornaby 50, Damtew SA, Dandona L, Dandona R, Dharmaratne SD, Duncan BB, Eshrati B, Esteghamati A, Feigin VL, Fernandes JC, Fürst T, Gebrehiwot TT, Gold A, Gona PN, Goto A, Habtewold TD, Hadush KT, Hafezi-Nejad N, Hay SI, Horino M, Islami F, Kamal R, Kasaeian A, Katikireddi SV, Kengne AP, Kesavachandran CN, Khader YS, Khang YH, Khubchandani J, Kim D, Kim YJ, Kinfu Y, Kosen S, Ku T, Defo BK, Kumar GA, Larson HJ, Leinsalu Yard, Liang 10, Lim SS, Liu P, Lopez Advert, Lozano R, Majeed A, Malekzadeh R, Malta DC, Mazidi M, McAlinden C, McGarvey ST, Mengistu DT, Mensah GA, Mensink GB, Mezgebe HB, Mirrakhimov EM, Mueller UO, Noubiap JJ, Obermeyer CM, Ogbo FA, Owolabi MO, Patton GC, Pourmalek F, Qorbani M, Rafay A, Rai RK, Ranabhat CL, Reinig N, Safiri S, Salomon JA, Sanabria JR, Santos IS, Sartorius B, Sawhney Thou, Schmidhuber J, Schutte AE, Schmidt MI, Sepanlou SG, Shamsizadeh Yard, Sheikhbahaei Due south, Shin MJ, Shiri R, Shiue I, Roba HS, Silva DA, Silverberg JI, Singh JA, Stranges S, Swaminathan S, Tabarés-Seisdedos R, Tadese F, Tedla BA, Tegegne BS, Terkawi AS, Thakur JS, Tonelli One thousand, Topor-Madry R, Tyrovolas S, Ukwaja KN, Uthman OA, Vaezghasemi Thou, Vasankari T, Vlassov VV, Vollset SE, Weiderpass E, Werdecker A, Wesana J, Westerman R, Yano Y, Yonemoto N, Yonga G, Zaidi Z, Zenebe ZM, Zipkin B, Murray CJ (July 2017). "Wellness Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years". The New England Periodical of Medicine. 377 (1): 13–27. doi:ten.1056/NEJMoa1614362. PMC5477817. PMID 28604169.
58. ^ Ashraf, Quamrul H.; Lester, Ashley; Weil, David Due north. (2009). "When Does Improving Health Raise GDP?". NBER Macroeconomics Annual. 23: 157–204. doi:10.1086/593084. ISSN 0889-3365. PMC3860117. PMID 24347816.
59. ^ "Social Wealth Index". The Center for Partnership Studies . Retrieved 17 September 2020.
60. ^ Gansbeke, Frank Van. "Climate change And Gross Domestic Product – Need For A Drastic Overhaul". Forbes . Retrieved 17 September 2020.
61. ^ "Economical growth and ecology sustainability". phys.org . Retrieved 20 September 2020.
62. ^ Landler, Marker; Sengupta, Somini (21 January 2020). "Trump and the Teenager: A Climate Showdown at Davos". The New York Times . Retrieved 20 September 2020.
63. ^ Kapoor, Amit; Debroy, Bibek (four October 2019). "Gross domestic product Is Non a Measure of Man Well-Being". Harvard Business Review . Retrieved 20 September 2020.
64. ^ "Rethinking Gross domestic product -- Finance & Development, March 2017". www.imf.org . Retrieved 20 September 2020.
65. ^ He, Guojun; Xie, Yang; Zhang, Bing (1 June 2020). "Expressways, Gdp, and the environment: The case of People's republic of china". Journal of Development Economics. 145: 102485. doi:ten.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102485. ISSN 0304-3878. S2CID 203596268. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
66. ^ "Gdp is destroying the planet. Here'southward an culling". World Economical Forum . Retrieved xx September 2020.
67. ^ Shahani, Severine Deneulin; Lila (2009). An Introduction to the Human Evolution and Adequacy : Approach (1st ed.). London: Earthscan Ltd. ISBN9781844078066.
68. ^ "Gross National Happiness (GNH) - A New Socioeconomic Development Policy Framework - A Policy White Paper - The American Pursuit of Unhappiness - Med Jones, IIM". Iim-edu.org. x January 2005.
69. ^ "Happiness Ministry in Dubai". 11 Feb 2016.
70. ^ "Harvard Kennedy School Report to US Congressman 21st Century Gdp: National Indicators for a New Era" (PDF).
71. ^ "GDP and beyond: Measuring progress in a changing world". European Union. 2009. Retrieved 26 Feb 2012.
72. ^ "Bhutan GNH Alphabetize"
73. ^ "Death by Gdp - how the climate crisis is driven past a growth yardstick". The Straits Times. 21 December 2019.

Further reading [edit]

• Australian Bureau for Statistics, Australian National Accounts: Concepts, Sources and Methods, 2000. Retrieved November 2009. In depth explanations of how GDP and other national accounts items are determined.
• Coyle, Diane (2014). GDP: A Brief but Affectionate History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN978-0-691-15679-viii.
• Joseph East. Stiglitz, "Measuring What Matters: Obsession with one financial figure, GDP, has worsened people's health, happiness and the environment, and economists want to supersede it", Scientific American, vol. 323, no. 2 (Baronial 2020), pp. 24–31.
• United States Section of Commerce, Agency of Economic Analysis, "Concepts and Methods of the Us National Income and Product Accounts" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on viii Nov 2017. Retrieved nine March 2018. . Retrieved November 2009. In depth explanations of how Gross domestic product and other national accounts items are determined.

External links [edit]

Global

• Australian Bureau of Statistics Manual on Gross domestic product measurement
• GDP-indexed bonds
• OECD Gross domestic product chart
• UN Statistical Databases
• Globe Development Indicators (WDI) at Worldbank.org
• World Gross domestic product Chart (since 1960)

Data

• Bureau of Economic Analysis: Official U.s.a. Gdp data
• Historicalstatistics.org: Links to historical statistics on Gross domestic product for countries and regions, maintained by the Department of Economic History at Stockholm University.
• Quandl - Gross domestic product by country - downloadable in CSV, Excel, JSON or XML
• Historical The states GDP (yearly data), 1790–present, maintained by Samuel H. Williamson and Lawrence H. Officer, both professors of economics at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
• Google – public data: Gdp and Personal Income of the U.S. (almanac): Nominal Gross Domestic Product
• The Maddison Projection of the Groningen Growth and Development Centre at the University of Groningen, kingdom of the netherlands. This project continues and extends the piece of work of Angus Maddison in collating all the bachelor, credible data estimating Gdp for countries around the world. This includes data for some countries for over 2,000 years back to 1 CE and for essentially all countries since 1950.

Manufactures and books

• Gross Domestic Product: An Economy'due south All, International monetary fund.
• Stiglitz JE, Sen A, Fitoussi J-P. Mismeasuring our Lives: Why GDP Doesn't Add Up, New Press, New York, 2010
• What'due south wrong with the GDP?
• Whether output and CPI inflation are mismeasured, by Nouriel Roubini and David Backus, in Lectures in Macroeconomics
• Rodney Edvinsson, Edvinsson, Rodney (2005). "Growth, Accumulation, Crisis: With New Macroeconomic Data for Sweden 1800–2000". Diva.
• Clifford Cobb, Ted Halstead and Jonathan Rowe. "If the GDP is up, why is America down?" The Atlantic Monthly, vol. 276, no. 4, October 1995, pages 59–78
• Jerorn C.J.Grand. van den Bergh, "Abolishing Gross domestic product"
• GDP and GNI in OECD Observer No246-247, December 2004-Jan 2005

lomaxmach1952.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_product

Share this post